On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:20:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > This was actually what I initially wrote, but we decided to go with the
> > on/off switch instead, because, in the UV4 time-frame, we're hoping to
> > get a few things changed so that
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:20:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > This was actually what I initially wrote, but we decided to go with the
> > on/off switch instead, because, in the UV4 time-frame, we're hoping to
> > get a few things changed so that
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> This was actually what I initially wrote, but we decided to go with the
> on/off switch instead, because, in the UV4 time-frame, we're hoping to
> get a few things changed so that we can default to having the bau *on*
> for the new UV4 systems.
>
> I
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> This was actually what I initially wrote, but we decided to go with the
> on/off switch instead, because, in the UV4 time-frame, we're hoping to
> get a few things changed so that we can default to having the bau *on*
> for the new UV4 systems.
>
> I
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:27:44PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> First of all, please use proper patch prefixes.
>
> x86/platform/uv:
Ah - sorry about that!
> And please fold the documentation change into the patch which changes the
>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:27:44PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> First of all, please use proper patch prefixes.
>
> x86/platform/uv:
Ah - sorry about that!
> And please fold the documentation change into the patch which changes the
>
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
First of all, please use proper patch prefixes.
x86/platform/uv:
And please fold the documentation change into the patch which changes the
parameter.
> static int timeout_us;
> -static int nobau;
> +static int nobau = 1;
> static int nobau_perm;
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Alex Thorlton wrote:
First of all, please use proper patch prefixes.
x86/platform/uv:
And please fold the documentation change into the patch which changes the
parameter.
> static int timeout_us;
> -static int nobau;
> +static int nobau = 1;
> static int nobau_perm;
For several years, the common practice has been to boot UVs with the
"nobau" parameter on the command line, to disable the BAU. We've
decided that it makes more sense to just disable the BAU by default in
the kernel, and provide the option to turn it on, if desired.
Signed-off-by: Alex Thorlton
For several years, the common practice has been to boot UVs with the
"nobau" parameter on the command line, to disable the BAU. We've
decided that it makes more sense to just disable the BAU by default in
the kernel, and provide the option to turn it on, if desired.
Signed-off-by: Alex Thorlton
10 matches
Mail list logo