On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:05:56 -0800
"David E. Box" wrote:
> +static int iosf_mbi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct resource *mem;
> +
> + /* Get and map MBI address space */
> + mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + iosf_mbi_data.addr =
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:05:56 -0800
David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com wrote:
+static int iosf_mbi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct resource *mem;
+
+ /* Get and map MBI address space */
+ mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> + bool "IOSF-SB MailBox Interface access support for Intel SOC's"
Any reason this can't be modular?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c
This is effectively a driver, so putting it under
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
+ bool IOSF-SB MailBox Interface access support for Intel SOC's
Any reason this can't be modular?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c
This is effectively a driver, so putting it under
From: "David E. Box"
Current Intel SOC cores use a MailBox Interface (MBI) to provide access to unit
devices connected to the system fabric. This driver implements the API required
for other kernel drivers to configure the unit registers accessible through this
interface. Drivers that will
From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com
Current Intel SOC cores use a MailBox Interface (MBI) to provide access to unit
devices connected to the system fabric. This driver implements the API required
for other kernel drivers to configure the unit registers accessible through this
6 matches
Mail list logo
