On Tuesday 12 February 2008 04:41:42 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> >
> > WMI drivers, like their ACPI counterparts, should also check if ACPI is
> > disabled or not, and bail out if so, otherwise we cause a crash.
>
> Shouldn't "wmi_has_guid()" just
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @@ -673,11 +673,11 @@ static int __init acpi_wmi_init(void)
> {
> acpi_status result;
>
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(_blocks.list);
> +
> if (acpi_disabled)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(_blocks.list);
> -
test
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -673,11 +673,11 @@ static int __init acpi_wmi_init(void)
{
acpi_status result;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(wmi_blocks.list);
+
if (acpi_disabled)
return -ENODEV;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(wmi_blocks.list);
-
test
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
>
> WMI drivers, like their ACPI counterparts, should also check if ACPI is
> disabled or not, and bail out if so, otherwise we cause a crash.
Shouldn't "wmi_has_guid()" just return false if ACPI isn't enabled, and
the drivers should just then
acer-wmi - Fail gracefully if ACPI is disabled
From: Carlos Corbacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WMI drivers, like their ACPI counterparts, should also check if ACPI is
disabled or not, and bail out if so, otherwise we cause a crash.
Spotted by Ingo Molnar.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho <[EMAIL
acer-wmi - Fail gracefully if ACPI is disabled
From: Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WMI drivers, like their ACPI counterparts, should also check if ACPI is
disabled or not, and bail out if so, otherwise we cause a crash.
Spotted by Ingo Molnar.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
WMI drivers, like their ACPI counterparts, should also check if ACPI is
disabled or not, and bail out if so, otherwise we cause a crash.
Shouldn't wmi_has_guid() just return false if ACPI isn't enabled, and
the drivers should just then always
7 matches
Mail list logo
