Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts

2015-10-02 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: > In some cases it is useful to know if the interrupt in question has chained > handler installed. For example when a cpu is offlined the architecture code > needs to know if it has any users so that it can fixup affinity > accordingly. > > To make this

[PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts

2015-10-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
In some cases it is useful to know if the interrupt in question has chained handler installed. For example when a cpu is offlined the architecture code needs to know if it has any users so that it can fixup affinity accordingly. To make this possible we introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED that is

[PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts

2015-10-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
In some cases it is useful to know if the interrupt in question has chained handler installed. For example when a cpu is offlined the architecture code needs to know if it has any users so that it can fixup affinity accordingly. To make this possible we introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED that is

Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Introduce a new flag IRQ_IS_CHAINED for chained interrupts

2015-10-02 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote: > In some cases it is useful to know if the interrupt in question has chained > handler installed. For example when a cpu is offlined the architecture code > needs to know if it has any users so that it can fixup affinity > accordingly. > > To make this