Am 07.06.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Jonathan Cameron :
> On 28/05/15 20:50, Marek Belisko wrote:
>> From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller"
>>
>> The bit mask to read the setting of the constant current source
>> for measuring the NTC voltage was the wrong one. Since default
>> value is initialized to the
On 28/05/15 20:50, Marek Belisko wrote:
> From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller"
>
> The bit mask to read the setting of the constant current source
> for measuring the NTC voltage was the wrong one. Since default
> value is initialized to the lowest level (000 = 10uA) the difference
> was probably never
Am 07.06.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Jonathan Cameron ji...@kernel.org:
On 28/05/15 20:50, Marek Belisko wrote:
From: H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com
The bit mask to read the setting of the constant current source
for measuring the NTC voltage was the wrong one. Since default
value is
On 28/05/15 20:50, Marek Belisko wrote:
From: H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com
The bit mask to read the setting of the constant current source
for measuring the NTC voltage was the wrong one. Since default
value is initialized to the lowest level (000 = 10uA) the difference
was
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller"
The bit mask to read the setting of the constant current source
for measuring the NTC voltage was the wrong one. Since default
value is initialized to the lowest level (000 = 10uA) the difference
was probably never noticed in practice.
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus
From: H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com
The bit mask to read the setting of the constant current source
for measuring the NTC voltage was the wrong one. Since default
value is initialized to the lowest level (000 = 10uA) the difference
was probably never noticed in practice.
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo
