[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Add "Section mismatch" warning
> whitelist for
> > powerpc
> >
> >
> > On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang
On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:33:50 +0530 "Satyam Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But I have slightly different (reversed) semantics for __init_refok
> in mind. Basically, we use __init_refok to annotate _callees_
> and not _callers_. In short, __init_refok is a _type_ of __init
> section that othe
On 5/15/07, Li Yang-r58472 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Actually, once __init_refok comes in, would we need any other
> whitelisting mechanism at all? I think the exception patterns in
> secref_whitelist() and those two other whitelisting functions
> (init_section_ref_ok and exit_section_
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 9:57 PM
> To: Sam Ravnborg
> Cc: Li Yang-r58472; Linus; Andrew Morton; Linux Kernel;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Add "Section mismatch" war
> -Original Message-
> From: Satyam Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:18 AM
> To: Kumar Gala
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg; Li Yang-r58472; Linus; Andrew Morton; Linux Kernel;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Add "
Hi,
On 5/14/07, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
>> This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings when
>> build powerpc platforms.
>>
>> -
>> WARNING: arch/
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:30:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I always get confused when a git-tree-owner says "acked-by" against a patch
> which falls within his tree's area. An acked-b
On May 14, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 08:56:52 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings wh
On Mon, 14 May 2007 08:56:52 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> >> This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings when
> >> build powerpc platforms.
> >>
> >> -
On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings when
build powerpc platforms.
-
WARNING: arch/powerpc/mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:earl
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings when
> build powerpc platforms.
>
> -
> WARNING: arch/powerpc/mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> .init.text:early_get_page from .text between 'pte_alloc_
This patch fixes the following "Section mismatch" warnings when
build powerpc platforms.
-
WARNING: arch/powerpc/mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:early_get_page from .text between 'pte_alloc_one_kernel' (at offset
0xc68) and 'pte_alloc_one'
WARNING: mm/built
12 matches
Mail list logo
