On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:13:55AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This should really be part of the patch adding the bindings...
> Would you like me to send the patch-set again?
When I said I'd applied the patch that was what I meant.
signature.asc
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:01:09AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > I'm assuming it's just the documentation patch you're missing.
>
> > Let me resend it as a single patch.
>
> This should really be part of the patch adding the bindings...
Would you like
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:01:09AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
I'm assuming it's just the documentation patch you're missing.
Let me resend it as a single patch.
This should really be part of the patch adding the bindings...
Would you like me to
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:13:55AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
This should really be part of the patch adding the bindings...
Would you like me to send the patch-set again?
When I said I'd applied the patch that was what I meant.
signature.asc
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:01:09AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> I'm assuming it's just the documentation patch you're missing.
> Let me resend it as a single patch.
This should really be part of the patch adding the bindings...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:01:09AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
I'm assuming it's just the documentation patch you're missing.
Let me resend it as a single patch.
This should really be part of the patch adding the bindings...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:29:56AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Not looked at the patch yet but patch 2 doesn't seem to have appeared?
>
> > Has it arrived yet?
>
> > Arnd responded to it, so it hit the
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:29:56AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Not looked at the patch yet but patch 2 doesn't seem to have appeared?
> Has it arrived yet?
> Arnd responded to it, so it hit the list.
> Since Arnd's comments I've also fired v2 up - do
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:16:59PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Here we provide the GPIO Regulator driver with Device Tree capability, so
> > that when a platform is booting with DT instead of platform data we can
> > still make full use of it.
>
> Not
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:16:59PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
Here we provide the GPIO Regulator driver with Device Tree capability, so
that when a platform is booting with DT instead of platform data we can
still make full use of it.
Not looked at
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:29:56AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
Not looked at the patch yet but patch 2 doesn't seem to have appeared?
Has it arrived yet?
Arnd responded to it, so it hit the list.
Since Arnd's comments I've also fired v2 up - do you see
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:29:56AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
Not looked at the patch yet but patch 2 doesn't seem to have appeared?
Has it arrived yet?
Arnd responded to it, so it hit the list.
Since
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:16:59PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Here we provide the GPIO Regulator driver with Device Tree capability, so
> that when a platform is booting with DT instead of platform data we can
> still make full use of it.
Not looked at the patch yet but patch 2 doesn't seem to
Here we provide the GPIO Regulator driver with Device Tree capability, so
that when a platform is booting with DT instead of platform data we can
still make full use of it.
Cc: Mark Brown
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c | 94
Here we provide the GPIO Regulator driver with Device Tree capability, so
that when a platform is booting with DT instead of platform data we can
still make full use of it.
Cc: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
---
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:16:59PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
Here we provide the GPIO Regulator driver with Device Tree capability, so
that when a platform is booting with DT instead of platform data we can
still make full use of it.
Not looked at the patch yet but patch 2 doesn't seem to have
16 matches
Mail list logo
