On 04/25/2014 02:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 April 2014 13:48, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
>
>> @@ -269,8 +269,6 @@ static void longhaul_setstate(struct cpufreq_policy
>> *policy,
>
> This routine has this code as w
On 25 April 2014 13:48, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> @@ -269,8 +269,6 @@ static void longhaul_setstate(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy,
This routine has this code as well:
mult = mults[mults_index & 0x1f];
if (mult == -1)
During frequency transitions, the cpufreq core takes the responsibility of
invoking cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end()
for those cpufreq drivers that define the ->target_index callback but don't
set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag.
The longhaul cpufreq driver falls under
3 matches
Mail list logo