Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:32:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, > which does not sleep for

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:32:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, > which does not sleep for

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:53:13AM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 4/11/2018 3:32 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > > i40iw_add_mqh_4()

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:53:13AM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 4/11/2018 3:32 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > > i40iw_add_mqh_4()

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:32:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, > which does not sleep for

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:32:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, > which does not sleep for

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On 4/11/2018 3:32 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. Despite never getting called from atomic context, i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, which does not sleep for allocation. GFP_ATOMIC is not

Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

On 4/11/2018 3:32 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. Despite never getting called from atomic context, i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, which does not sleep for allocation. GFP_ATOMIC is not

[PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. Despite never getting called from atomic context, i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, which does not sleep for allocation. GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with

[PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4

i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. Despite never getting called from atomic context, i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, which does not sleep for allocation. GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with