On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
> Add security checks to make sure we are not attempting to expand the
> stack into memory protected by mmap_min_addr
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please include the LSMs list in the CC line (added again) for posts
relating to
Add security checks to make sure we are not attempting to expand the
stack into memory protected by mmap_min_addr
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
** Be very careful applying/rediffing this patch. Standard 3 lines of
context from git diff will misapply the first hunk to
Add security checks to make sure we are not attempting to expand the
stack into memory protected by mmap_min_addr
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
** Be very careful applying/rediffing this patch. Standard 3 lines of
context from git diff will misapply the first hunk to
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
Add security checks to make sure we are not attempting to expand the
stack into memory protected by mmap_min_addr
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please include the LSMs list in the CC line (added again) for posts
relating to security.
When adding the new security hooks into mmap to enhance protection
against NULL pointers in the kernel I overlooked that a user may be able
to expand the stack all the way down to low addresses. This flaw was
pointed out by a PaX/grsecurity developer and this patch should provide
protection
When adding the new security hooks into mmap to enhance protection
against NULL pointers in the kernel I overlooked that a user may be able
to expand the stack all the way down to low addresses. This flaw was
pointed out by a PaX/grsecurity developer and this patch should provide
protection
6 matches
Mail list logo
