Am 27.02.2015 um 11:29 schrieb DaeSeok Youn:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-27 18:41 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger :
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
>>> after update changelog?
>>
>> One thing that
Hi,
2015-02-27 18:41 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger :
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
>> after update changelog?
>
> One thing that is much more important, how did you test this patch? Did you?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
> after update changelog?
One thing that is much more important, how did you test this patch? Did you?
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi,
I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
after update changelog?
Thanks.
Regards,
Daeseok Youn
2015-02-27 6:33 GMT+09:00 Andrew Morton :
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:10 +0900 Daeseok Youn
> wrote:
>
>> Use 'retval' instead of 'status'.
>>
>
> The patch does a lot
Am 27.02.2015 um 11:29 schrieb DaeSeok Youn:
Hi,
2015-02-27 18:41 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn daeseok.y...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
after update
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn daeseok.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
after update changelog?
One thing that is much more important, how did you test this patch? Did you?
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe
Hi,
I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
after update changelog?
Thanks.
Regards,
Daeseok Youn
2015-02-27 6:33 GMT+09:00 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:10 +0900 Daeseok Youn daeseok.y...@gmail.com
wrote:
Use 'retval'
Hi,
2015-02-27 18:41 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn daeseok.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
after update changelog?
One thing that is much more important,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:10 +0900 Daeseok Youn wrote:
> Use 'retval' instead of 'status'.
>
The patch does a lot more than this. It causes __ocfs2_add_entry to
propagate error codes which were previously dropped on the floor.
Please update the changelog to fully explain the functional
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:10 +0900 Daeseok Youn daeseok.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Use 'retval' instead of 'status'.
The patch does a lot more than this. It causes __ocfs2_add_entry to
propagate error codes which were previously dropped on the floor.
Please update the changelog to fully explain
Use 'retval' instead of 'status'.
Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn
---
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index b08050b..1478a50 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ int
Use 'retval' instead of 'status'.
Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn daeseok.y...@gmail.com
---
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
index b08050b..1478a50 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@
12 matches
Mail list logo
