On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:00:05 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-09-28 17:43:55, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > This patch introduces a new per-console loglevel setting, and changes
> > console_unlock() to use max(global_level, per_console_level) when
> > deciding whether or not to
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:00:05 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-09-28 17:43:55, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > This patch introduces a new per-console loglevel setting, and changes
> > console_unlock() to use max(global_level, per_console_level) when
> > deciding whether or not to emit a given log
On Thu 2017-09-28 17:43:55, Calvin Owens wrote:
> This patch introduces a new per-console loglevel setting, and changes
> console_unlock() to use max(global_level, per_console_level) when
> deciding whether or not to emit a given log message.
> diff --git a/include/linux/console.h
On Thu 2017-09-28 17:43:55, Calvin Owens wrote:
> This patch introduces a new per-console loglevel setting, and changes
> console_unlock() to use max(global_level, per_console_level) when
> deciding whether or not to emit a given log message.
> diff --git a/include/linux/console.h
On 10/20/2017 01:05 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu 2017-10-19 16:40:45, Calvin Owens wrote:
On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial
On 10/20/2017 01:05 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu 2017-10-19 16:40:45, Calvin Owens wrote:
On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial
On Thu 2017-10-19 16:40:45, Calvin Owens wrote:
> On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> >Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
> >the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
> >are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of
On Thu 2017-10-19 16:40:45, Calvin Owens wrote:
> On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
> >Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
> >the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
> >are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of
On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of milliseconds banging
the UART to emit a message, which can
On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of milliseconds banging
the UART to emit a message, which can
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of milliseconds banging
the UART to emit a message, which can cause application-level problems
when the
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of milliseconds banging
the UART to emit a message, which can cause application-level problems
when the
12 matches
Mail list logo