On 2016年11月15日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
> > > >On
On 2016年11月15日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
> > > >On
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
> > > > On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
> > > > On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月10日 00:38,
On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月10日 00:38,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
> > On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
> > On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S.
On 16-11-10 08:28 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Wed,
On 16-11-10 08:28 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> >On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Wed,
On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Backlog were
On 2016年11月11日 12:17, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Backlog were
On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1
On 16-11-10 07:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1
On 2016年11月11日 11:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1
On 2016年11月11日 11:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
> > > one time since it was scheduled
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:07:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
> > > one time since it was scheduled
On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
one time since it was scheduled during sendmsg() synchronously in
process context. This lead bad cache utilization
On 2016年11月10日 00:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
one time since it was scheduled during sendmsg() synchronously in
process context. This lead bad cache utilization
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
> one time since it was scheduled during sendmsg() synchronously in
> process context. This lead bad cache utilization so this patch tries
> to do some batching before
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
> one time since it was scheduled during sendmsg() synchronously in
> process context. This lead bad cache utilization so this patch tries
> to do some batching before
Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
one time since it was scheduled during sendmsg() synchronously in
process context. This lead bad cache utilization so this patch tries
to do some batching before call rx NAPI. This is done through:
- accept MSG_MORE as a hint
Backlog were used for tuntap rx, but it can only process 1 packet at
one time since it was scheduled during sendmsg() synchronously in
process context. This lead bad cache utilization so this patch tries
to do some batching before call rx NAPI. This is done through:
- accept MSG_MORE as a hint
24 matches
Mail list logo