Hi Bjorn,
On 01/12/2017 03:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
>> It can be replaced to one register accessor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
>>
Hi Jaehoon,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:16:11PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
> It can be replaced to one register accessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214
> +++-
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:17:37PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
> It can be replaced to one register accessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214
> +++--
There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
It can be replaced to one register accessor.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
---
drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214 +++---
1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dr
There is no reason to maintain *_blk/phy/elbi_* as register accessors.
It can be replaced to one register accessor.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
---
drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 214 +++---
1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dr
5 matches
Mail list logo