Re: [PATCH 1/4] clocksource: em_sti: remove unnecessary OOM messages

2014-05-22 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 05/22/2014 06:55 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: On Monday, May 19, 2014 7:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 04/29/2014 10:26 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: The site-specific OOM messages are unnecessary, because they duplicate the MM subsystem generic OOM message. Are you sure the MM subsys display a message

Re: [PATCH 1/4] clocksource: em_sti: remove unnecessary OOM messages

2014-05-22 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:55:20PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Monday, May 19, 2014 7:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 04/29/2014 10:26 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > > > The site-specific OOM messages are unnecessary, because they > > > duplicate the MM subsystem generic OOM message. > > > > Are yo

Re: [PATCH 1/4] clocksource: em_sti: remove unnecessary OOM messages

2014-05-21 Thread Jingoo Han
On Monday, May 19, 2014 7:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 04/29/2014 10:26 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > > The site-specific OOM messages are unnecessary, because they > > duplicate the MM subsystem generic OOM message. > > Are you sure the MM subsys display a message when an allocation fails ? > > T

Re: [PATCH 1/4] clocksource: em_sti: remove unnecessary OOM messages

2014-05-19 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 04/29/2014 10:26 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: The site-specific OOM messages are unnecessary, because they duplicate the MM subsystem generic OOM message. Are you sure the MM subsys display a message when an allocation fails ? There are multiple reasons an allocation can fail. Signed-off-by: Jin

[PATCH 1/4] clocksource: em_sti: remove unnecessary OOM messages

2014-04-29 Thread Jingoo Han
The site-specific OOM messages are unnecessary, because they duplicate the MM subsystem generic OOM message. Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han --- drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c |4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c b/drivers/clocksource/em_