Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency

2018-12-07 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:57:28 PST (-0800), atish.pa...@wdc.com wrote: From: Palmer Dabbelt Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly, because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place. This corrects the issue, moving it from / { cpus {

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency

2018-12-07 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:57:28 PST (-0800), atish.pa...@wdc.com wrote: From: Palmer Dabbelt Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly, because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place. This corrects the issue, moving it from / { cpus {

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency

2018-12-03 Thread Atish Patra
From: Palmer Dabbelt Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly, because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place. This corrects the issue, moving it from / { cpus { timebase-frequency = X; } } to / { cpus {

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Correct RISC-V's timebase-frequency

2018-12-03 Thread Atish Patra
From: Palmer Dabbelt Someone must have read the device tree specification incorrectly, because we were putting timebase-frequency in the wrong place. This corrects the issue, moving it from / { cpus { timebase-frequency = X; } } to / { cpus {