Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

2018-04-11 12:12 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : > On 2018-04-11 12:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> 2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : >>> On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used by i2c

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

2018-04-11 12:12 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : > On 2018-04-11 12:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> 2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : >>> On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used by i2c core. >>> >>> It seems to be used

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

On 2018-04-11 12:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : >> On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used >>> by i2c core. >> >> It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? >> >>

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

On 2018-04-11 12:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : >> On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used >>> by i2c core. >> >> It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? >> >> This could easily

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : > On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used >> by i2c core. > > It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? > > This could easily be me not understanding something... >

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

2018-04-11 11:56 GMT+02:00 Peter Rosin : > On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used >> by i2c core. > > It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? > > This could easily be me not understanding something... > Yes, but i2c

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used > by i2c core. It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? This could easily be me not understanding something... Cheers, Peter > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski >

Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used > by i2c core. It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ??? This could easily be me not understanding something... Cheers, Peter > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- >

[PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used by i2c core. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c index 0c125f207aea..2310f26ac4f3

[PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to at24_driver

We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used by i2c core. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c index 0c125f207aea..2310f26ac4f3 100644 ---