Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-09-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > > We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ > > > domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-09-02 Thread Charles Keepax
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ > > domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable > > callbacks are defined however, there

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-09-02 Thread Charles Keepax
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable callbacks are defined however, there are some

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-09-02 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-08-21 Thread Charles Keepax
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: > > static struct irq_chip arizona_irq_chip = { > > .name = "arizona", > > - .irq_disable= arizona_irq_disable, > > - .irq_enable =

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-08-21 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: > We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ > domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable > callbacks are defined however, there are some situations where additional > callbacks will be used from the

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-08-21 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable callbacks are defined however, there are some situations where additional callbacks will be used from the IRQ

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-08-21 Thread Charles Keepax
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Charles Keepax wrote: static struct irq_chip arizona_irq_chip = { .name = arizona, - .irq_disable= arizona_irq_disable, - .irq_enable = arizona_irq_enable,

[PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-08-12 Thread Charles Keepax
We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable callbacks are defined however, there are some situations where additional callbacks will be used from the IRQ core, which currently results in an NULL

[PATCH 1/4] mfd: arizona: Add additional dummy IRQ callbacks

2014-08-12 Thread Charles Keepax
We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ domains on the Arizona devices. Currently only the enable and disable callbacks are defined however, there are some situations where additional callbacks will be used from the IRQ core, which currently results in an NULL