On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:26 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:28:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > Previously we would loudly crash if someone passed NULL to
> > devm_request_free_mem_region(), but now it will silently work and the
> > result will leak. Perhaps
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:28:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Previously we would loudly crash if someone passed NULL to
> devm_request_free_mem_region(), but now it will silently work and the
> result will leak. Perhaps this wants a:
We'd still instantly crash due to the dev_name
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:10 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Factor out the guts of devm_request_free_mem_region so that we can
> implement both a device managed and a manually release version as
> tiny wrappers around it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny
> ---
>
Factor out the guts of devm_request_free_mem_region so that we can
implement both a device managed and a manually release version as
tiny wrappers around it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny
---
include/linux/ioport.h | 2 ++
kernel/resource.c | 45
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:01:34PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:54:31 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > Just add a simple macro that passes a NULL dev argument to
> > dev_request_free_mem_region, and call request_mem_region in the
> > function for that particular case.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:54:31 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just add a simple macro that passes a NULL dev argument to
> dev_request_free_mem_region, and call request_mem_region in the
> function for that particular case.
Nit:
> +struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource
Just add a simple macro that passes a NULL dev argument to
dev_request_free_mem_region, and call request_mem_region in the
function for that particular case.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
include/linux/ioport.h | 2 ++
kernel/resource.c | 45
7 matches
Mail list logo
