Hi Jason,
On 06/12/16 22:13, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Matt Redfearn wrote:
+void *irq_stack[NR_CPUS];
I'm curious why you implemented it this way rather than using
DEFINE_PER_CPU and the related percpu helper functions.
Because in
Hi Jason,
On 06/12/16 22:13, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Matt Redfearn wrote:
+void *irq_stack[NR_CPUS];
I'm curious why you implemented it this way rather than using
DEFINE_PER_CPU and the related percpu helper functions.
Because in the IRQ entry point in
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> +void *irq_stack[NR_CPUS];
I'm curious why you implemented it this way rather than using
DEFINE_PER_CPU and the related percpu helper functions.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Matt Redfearn wrote:
> +void *irq_stack[NR_CPUS];
I'm curious why you implemented it this way rather than using
DEFINE_PER_CPU and the related percpu helper functions.
Allocate a per-cpu irq stack for use within interrupt handlers.
Also add a utility function on_irq_stack to determine if a given stack
pointer is within the irq stack for that cpu.
Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn
---
arch/mips/include/asm/irq.h| 12
Allocate a per-cpu irq stack for use within interrupt handlers.
Also add a utility function on_irq_stack to determine if a given stack
pointer is within the irq stack for that cpu.
Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn
---
arch/mips/include/asm/irq.h| 12
6 matches
Mail list logo