On 6/19/2013 5:01 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 06/18/2013 09:44 AM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
[...]
+/*
+ * Spin_locks are changed to mutexes if PREEMPT_RT is enabled,
+ * i.e they can sleep. This fact is problem for us because
+ * add_wait_queue()/wake_up_all() takes wait queue spi
On 06/18/2013 09:44 AM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
[...]
>>> +/*
>>> + * Spin_locks are changed to mutexes if PREEMPT_RT is enabled,
>>> + * i.e they can sleep. This fact is problem for us because
>>> + * add_wait_queue()/wake_up_all() takes wait queue spin lock.
>>> + * Since spin lock
On 6/18/2013 7:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Akhil Goyal wrote:
On 6/18/2013 2:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
+ /*
+* Spin_locks are changed to mutexes if PREEMPT_RT is enabled,
+* i.e they can sleep. This fact is problem for us because
+* add_w
On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> On 6/18/2013 2:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * Spin_locks are changed to mutexes if PREEMPT_RT is enabled,
> >> + * i.e they can sleep. This fact is problem for us because
> >> + * add_wait_queue()/wake_up_all() takes wait queue sp
On 6/18/2013 2:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 17 June 2013, akhil.go...@freescale.com wrote:
+
+menuconfig RFDEVICES
+ default n
+ bool "RF interface device support"
+ ---help---
+ Support for RF interface devices.
+ In a baseband system, different radios (RF
On Monday 17 June 2013, akhil.go...@freescale.com wrote:
> +
> +menuconfig RFDEVICES
> + default n
> + bool "RF interface device support"
> + ---help---
> + Support for RF interface devices.
> + In a baseband system, different radios (RF PHYs) are
> + connected depending on
6 matches
Mail list logo