Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-20 Thread Masahiro Yamada 
2017-03-20 21:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon :
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
>> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
>> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
>> >>> Cc: Will Deacon 
>> >>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
>> >>> ---
>> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
>> >
>> > Great, please merge it.
>> >
>> >> but I don't see
>> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
>> >
>> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
>> >
>>
>> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
>>
>>
>> So, how shall we handle this series?
>>
>>
>> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
>> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
>>
>>
>>
>> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
>> to linux-kbuild.
>
> Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon 
>
> So please take this via linux-kbuild.
>
> Will


Applied to linux-kbuild/misc.  Thanks!




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-20 Thread Masahiro Yamada 
2017-03-20 21:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon :
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
>> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
>> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
>> >>> Cc: Will Deacon 
>> >>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
>> >>> ---
>> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
>> >
>> > Great, please merge it.
>> >
>> >> but I don't see
>> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
>> >
>> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
>> >
>>
>> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
>>
>>
>> So, how shall we handle this series?
>>
>>
>> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
>> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
>>
>>
>>
>> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
>> to linux-kbuild.
>
> Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon 
>
> So please take this via linux-kbuild.
>
> Will


Applied to linux-kbuild/misc.  Thanks!




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-20 Thread Will Deacon 
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
> >>> Cc: Will Deacon 
> >>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
> >
> > Great, please merge it.
> >
> >> but I don't see
> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
> >
> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
> >
> 
> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
> 
> 
> So, how shall we handle this series?
> 
> 
> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
> 
> 
> 
> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
> to linux-kbuild.

Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:

Acked-by: Will Deacon 

So please take this via linux-kbuild.

Will

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-20 Thread Will Deacon 
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
> >>> Cc: Will Deacon 
> >>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
> >
> > Great, please merge it.
> >
> >> but I don't see
> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
> >
> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
> >
> 
> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
> 
> 
> So, how shall we handle this series?
> 
> 
> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
> 
> 
> 
> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
> to linux-kbuild.

Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:

Acked-by: Will Deacon 

So please take this via linux-kbuild.

Will

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-18 Thread Masahiro Yamada 
Hi Will, Michal,

2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>>>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
>>> Cc: Will Deacon 
>>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
>
> Great, please merge it.
>
>
>> but I don't see
>> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
>
> I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.


So, how shall we handle this series?


I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.



If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
to linux-kbuild.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-18 Thread Masahiro Yamada 
Hi Will, Michal,

2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>>>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
>>> Cc: Will Deacon 
>>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
>
> Great, please merge it.
>
>
>> but I don't see
>> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
>
> I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.


So, how shall we handle this series?


I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.



If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
to linux-kbuild.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-10 Thread Michal Marek 
Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
>> Cc: Will Deacon 
>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,

Great, please merge it.


> but I don't see
> the rest of the series queued anywhere.

I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.

Thanks,
Michal

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-10 Thread Michal Marek 
Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
>> Cc: Will Deacon 
>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,

Great, please merge it.


> but I don't see
> the rest of the series queued anywhere.

I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.

Thanks,
Michal

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-10 Thread Will Deacon 
Hi Michael,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
> Cc: Will Deacon 
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it, but I don't see
the rest of the series queued anywhere.

Thanks,

Will

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> index 3635b8662724..80b6866bcacb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ libs-y:= arch/arm64/lib/ $(libs-y)
>  core-$(CONFIG_EFI_STUB) += $(objtree)/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a
>  
>  # Default target when executing plain make
> -KBUILD_IMAGE := Image.gz
> +boot := arch/arm64/boot
> +KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/Image.gz
>  KBUILD_DTBS  := dtbs
>  
> -all: $(KBUILD_IMAGE) $(KBUILD_DTBS)
> +all: Image.gz $(KBUILD_DTBS)
>  
> -boot := arch/arm64/boot
>  
>  Image: vmlinux
>   $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(boot)/$@
> -- 
> 2.10.0
>

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2017-03-10 Thread Will Deacon 
Hi Michael,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas 
> Cc: Will Deacon 
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it, but I don't see
the rest of the series queued anywhere.

Thanks,

Will

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> index 3635b8662724..80b6866bcacb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ libs-y:= arch/arm64/lib/ $(libs-y)
>  core-$(CONFIG_EFI_STUB) += $(objtree)/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a
>  
>  # Default target when executing plain make
> -KBUILD_IMAGE := Image.gz
> +boot := arch/arm64/boot
> +KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/Image.gz
>  KBUILD_DTBS  := dtbs
>  
> -all: $(KBUILD_IMAGE) $(KBUILD_DTBS)
> +all: Image.gz $(KBUILD_DTBS)
>  
> -boot := arch/arm64/boot
>  
>  Image: vmlinux
>   $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(boot)/$@
> -- 
> 2.10.0
>

[PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2016-11-22 Thread Michal Marek 
The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.

Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
---
 arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
index 3635b8662724..80b6866bcacb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
@@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ libs-y  := arch/arm64/lib/ $(libs-y)
 core-$(CONFIG_EFI_STUB) += $(objtree)/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a
 
 # Default target when executing plain make
-KBUILD_IMAGE   := Image.gz
+boot   := arch/arm64/boot
+KBUILD_IMAGE   := $(boot)/Image.gz
 KBUILD_DTBS:= dtbs
 
-all:   $(KBUILD_IMAGE) $(KBUILD_DTBS)
+all:   Image.gz $(KBUILD_DTBS)
 
-boot := arch/arm64/boot
 
 Image: vmlinux
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(boot)/$@
-- 
2.10.0

[PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

2016-11-22 Thread Michal Marek 
The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.

Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek 
---
 arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
index 3635b8662724..80b6866bcacb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
@@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ libs-y  := arch/arm64/lib/ $(libs-y)
 core-$(CONFIG_EFI_STUB) += $(objtree)/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a
 
 # Default target when executing plain make
-KBUILD_IMAGE   := Image.gz
+boot   := arch/arm64/boot
+KBUILD_IMAGE   := $(boot)/Image.gz
 KBUILD_DTBS:= dtbs
 
-all:   $(KBUILD_IMAGE) $(KBUILD_DTBS)
+all:   Image.gz $(KBUILD_DTBS)
 
-boot := arch/arm64/boot
 
 Image: vmlinux
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(boot)/$@
-- 
2.10.0