Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/8] arm/xen: Remove helpers which are PV specific

2015-08-04 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 31/07/15 11:55, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> +/* Only used in PV code. However ARM guest is always assimilated as >>> HVM. */ >>^ "However" doesn't make sense here from an >>english grammer point of view. > > "English grammar" :-P

Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm/xen: Remove helpers which are PV specific

2015-07-31 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 11:44 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Julien Grall wrote: > > ARM guests are assimilated to HVM guest on ARM. The current > > implementation is assuming a 1:1 mapping which is only true for DOM0 > > and > > may not be at all in the future. > > > > Fur

Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm/xen: Remove helpers which are PV specific

2015-07-31 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Julien Grall wrote: > ARM guests are assimilated to HVM guest on ARM. The current > implementation is assuming a 1:1 mapping which is only true for DOM0 and > may not be at all in the future. > > Furthermore, all the helpers but arbitrary_virt_to_machine are used in > x86 spec

[PATCH 1/8] arm/xen: Remove helpers which are PV specific

2015-07-28 Thread Julien Grall
ARM guests are assimilated to HVM guest on ARM. The current implementation is assuming a 1:1 mapping which is only true for DOM0 and may not be at all in the future. Furthermore, all the helpers but arbitrary_virt_to_machine are used in x86 specific code (or only compiled for). The helper arbitra