On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 14:50 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:47 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 03:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How much testing did it get? I've several test setups involving
> > > autofs, but they are nowhere near
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 14:50 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:47 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 03:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How much testing did it get? I've several test setups involving
> > > autofs, but they are nowhere near
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:47 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 03:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> >
> > How much testing did it get? I've several test setups involving
> > autofs, but they are nowhere near exhaustive and I don't have good
> > enough feel of the codebase to slap
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:47 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 03:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> >
> > How much testing did it get? I've several test setups involving
> > autofs, but they are nowhere near exhaustive and I don't have good
> > enough feel of the codebase to slap
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 03:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 07:39:36AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe Al has been too busy to comment, he has been on the Cc from the start.
> That's... a very mild version of what's been going on. Let's just say that
> the last few weeks
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 03:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 07:39:36AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe Al has been too busy to comment, he has been on the Cc from the start.
> That's... a very mild version of what's been going on. Let's just say that
> the last few weeks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 07:39:36AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> Maybe Al has been too busy to comment, he has been on the Cc from the start.
That's... a very mild version of what's been going on. Let's just say that
the last few weeks had been really interesting. Not that the shit has
settled, but
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 07:39:36AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> Maybe Al has been too busy to comment, he has been on the Cc from the start.
That's... a very mild version of what's been going on. Let's just say that
the last few weeks had been really interesting. Not that the shit has
settled, but
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 12:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:33:52 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
>
> > For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> > mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> > operation will
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 12:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:33:52 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
>
> > For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> > mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> > operation will need to take a path
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:33:52 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
> For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
This patchset
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:33:52 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
> For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
This patchset contains lots of
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:04 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> > mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> > operation will need to take a path argument
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:04 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> > For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> > mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> > operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Ian Kent writes:
> For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Taking a quick look overall I see no issues with
Ian Kent writes:
> For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
> mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
> operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Taking a quick look overall I see no issues with this series.
For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Eric W.
For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Omar Sandoval
---
For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Eric W.
For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a
mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry
operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: Eric W. Biederman
Cc: Omar Sandoval
---
20 matches
Mail list logo