On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:48:29PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 01-02-14 17:48:27, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:39:22PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Block layer currently abuses rq->csd.list.next for storing fifo_time.
> > > That is a terrible hack and completely unn
On Sat 01-02-14 17:48:27, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:39:22PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Block layer currently abuses rq->csd.list.next for storing fifo_time.
> > That is a terrible hack and completely unnecessary as well. Union
> > achieves the same space saving in a cl
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:39:22PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Block layer currently abuses rq->csd.list.next for storing fifo_time.
> That is a terrible hack and completely unnecessary as well. Union
> achieves the same space saving in a cleaner way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
Hi Jan,
Taken as i
Block layer currently abuses rq->csd.list.next for storing fifo_time.
That is a terrible hack and completely unnecessary as well. Union
achieves the same space saving in a cleaner way.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 8
block/deadline-iosched.c | 8
inclu
4 matches
Mail list logo