Re: [PATCH 10/10] ARM: ux500: Stop informing the regulator subsystem that we have full constraints

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > The regulator_has_full_constraints() call is not required if we > are booting with Device Tree as it's assumed in this case. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Acked-by: Linus Walleij Thanks, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

[PATCH 10/10] ARM: ux500: Stop informing the regulator subsystem that we have full constraints

The regulator_has_full_constraints() call is not required if we are booting with Device Tree as it's assumed in this case. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c |3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c

[PATCH 10/10] ARM: ux500: Stop informing the regulator subsystem that we have full constraints

The regulator_has_full_constraints() call is not required if we are booting with Device Tree as it's assumed in this case. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c |3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c

Re: [PATCH 10/10] ARM: ux500: Stop informing the regulator subsystem that we have full constraints

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: The regulator_has_full_constraints() call is not required if we are booting with Device Tree as it's assumed in this case. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org