On 1/18/19 1:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 1/16/19 9:12 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 1/16/19 9:28 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
to
On 1/16/19 9:12 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
On 1/16/19 9:28 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left
On 1/16/19 9:28 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
>> to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left NULL
>> except here. We can make it
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
> to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left NULL
> except here. We can make it required and check for it at some point,
> for now
The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left NULL
except here. We can make it required and check for it at some point,
for now lets just prevent this from causing a NULL pointer exception.
Signed-off-by: Andrew
5 matches
Mail list logo
