Re: [PATCH 11/21] usb: chipidea: msm: Use hw_write_id_reg() instead of writel directly

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:28:28AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The MSM_USB_BASE macro trick is not very clear, and we're using > it for only one register write so let's just move to using > hw_write_id_reg() and passing the ci pointer instead. That > clearly shows what offset we're using and

Re: [PATCH 11/21] usb: chipidea: msm: Use hw_write_id_reg() instead of writel directly

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:28:28AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The MSM_USB_BASE macro trick is not very clear, and we're using > it for only one register write so let's just move to using > hw_write_id_reg() and passing the ci pointer instead. That > clearly shows what offset we're using and

[PATCH 11/21] usb: chipidea: msm: Use hw_write_id_reg() instead of writel directly

The MSM_USB_BASE macro trick is not very clear, and we're using it for only one register write so let's just move to using hw_write_id_reg() and passing the ci pointer instead. That clearly shows what offset we're using and avoids needing to include the msm_hsusb_hw.h file when we're going to

[PATCH 11/21] usb: chipidea: msm: Use hw_write_id_reg() instead of writel directly

The MSM_USB_BASE macro trick is not very clear, and we're using it for only one register write so let's just move to using hw_write_id_reg() and passing the ci pointer instead. That clearly shows what offset we're using and avoids needing to include the msm_hsusb_hw.h file when we're going to