Re: [PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Finn, > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Finn Thain > wrote: > > It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And in > > adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a > >

Re: [PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Finn, > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Finn Thain > wrote: > > It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And in > > adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a > > struct device. Drivers will then

Re: [PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

Hi Finn, On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And > in adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a > struct device. Drivers will then bind with boards, not with

Re: [PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

Hi Finn, On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Finn Thain wrote: > It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And > in adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a > struct device. Drivers will then bind with boards, not with functional > resources. > > Rename

[PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And in adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a struct device. Drivers will then bind with boards, not with functional resources. Rename struct nubus_dev as struct nubus_functional_resource. This is the vendor's

[PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And in adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a struct device. Drivers will then bind with boards, not with functional resources. Rename struct nubus_dev as struct nubus_functional_resource. This is the vendor's