Hello Rob and Jonathan,
On 08/24/2015 12:10 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 20/08/15 23:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Hello Michael,
>>>
>>> On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM
Hello Rob and Jonathan,
On 08/24/2015 12:10 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron ji...@kernel.org wrote:
On 20/08/15 23:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 20/08/15 23:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron ji...@kernel.org wrote:
On 20/08/15 23:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015
On 21/08/15 00:53, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:48:23AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 20/08/15 23:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Hello Michael,
>>>
>>> On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015
On 20/08/15 23:48, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM
On 21/08/15 00:53, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:48:23AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:48:23AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> Hello Michael,
> >>
> >> On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
> >>
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
>> the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
>>
>
> Is an OF
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
> the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
>
Is an OF style match necessary?
I have been using devicetree and it matches based
The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c
The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@osg.samsung.com
---
drivers/iio/adc/mcp320x.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:48:23AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Thu, Aug
Hello Michael,
On 08/21/2015 12:29 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The driver has an
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
Is an OF style match necessary?
I have been using devicetree and it matches based on
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
the SPI core can't do an OF style match and the table was unused.
Is an OF style match
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Michael,
On 08/20/2015 10:09 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:26AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
The driver has an OF id table but the .of_match_table is not set so
the SPI
20 matches
Mail list logo