On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:35:35PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg->weight.
> Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
> weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
> works fine as long as
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:35:35PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg-weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
works fine as long as all
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg->weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
works fine as long as all cfqgs are treated equally regardless of
their positions in the
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg-weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
works fine as long as all cfqgs are treated equally regardless of
their positions in the
4 matches
Mail list logo
