Hi Geert,
On Thursday 10 December 2015 10:21:27 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Friday 20 November 2015
Hi Geert,
On Thursday 10 December 2015 10:21:27 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Friday 20 November 2015
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > On Friday 20 November 2015
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Thu,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> The "renesas,scif"
Hi Geert,
On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 19 November 2015
Hi Geert,
On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
> >> variant in all
Hi Geert,
On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
> >> variant in all
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Geert,
On Friday 20 November 2015 16:30:22 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2015 08:46:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 19 November 2015
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
>> variant in all Renesas SoCs of the R-Car family. However, the variant
>> used in the
Hi Geert,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
> variant in all Renesas SoCs of the R-Car family. However, the variant
> used in the R-Car family is not the common "SH-4(A)"
The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
variant in all Renesas SoCs of the R-Car family. However, the variant
used in the R-Car family is not the common "SH-4(A)" variant, but a
derivative with added "Baud Rate Generator for External Clock" (BRG),
which is also present
The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
variant in all Renesas SoCs of the R-Car family. However, the variant
used in the R-Car family is not the common "SH-4(A)" variant, but a
derivative with added "Baud Rate Generator for External Clock" (BRG),
which is also present
Hi Geert,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
> variant in all Renesas SoCs of the R-Car family. However, the variant
> used in the R-Car family is not the common "SH-4(A)"
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:56 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> The "renesas,scif" compatible value is currently used for the SCIF
>> variant in all Renesas SoCs of the R-Car family.
18 matches
Mail list logo