Re: [PATCH 18/32] hexagon: delete __cpuinit usage from all hexagon files

2013-07-08 Thread Richard Kuo
On 06/24/2013 02:30 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU

Re: [PATCH 18/32] hexagon: delete __cpuinit usage from all hexagon files

2013-07-08 Thread Richard Kuo
On 06/24/2013 02:30 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 (x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU

[PATCH 18/32] hexagon: delete __cpuinit usage from all hexagon files

2013-06-24 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of

[PATCH 18/32] hexagon: delete __cpuinit usage from all hexagon files

2013-06-24 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 (x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time) is a good example of the nasty type of