Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Loudly complain about the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE

Hi, On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 at 11:02 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > There is a huge number of broken device trees out there. Just > grepping through the tree for the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in conjunction > with the GIC is scary. > > People just don't realise that IRQ_TYPE_NONE just doesn't exist, and >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Loudly complain about the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE

Hi, On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 at 11:02 AM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > There is a huge number of broken device trees out there. Just > grepping through the tree for the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in conjunction > with the GIC is scary. > > People just don't realise that IRQ_TYPE_NONE just doesn't exist, and >

[PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Loudly complain about the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE

There is a huge number of broken device trees out there. Just grepping through the tree for the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in conjunction with the GIC is scary. People just don't realise that IRQ_TYPE_NONE just doesn't exist, and you just get whatever junk was there before. So let's make them aware of

[PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v3: Loudly complain about the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE

There is a huge number of broken device trees out there. Just grepping through the tree for the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in conjunction with the GIC is scary. People just don't realise that IRQ_TYPE_NONE just doesn't exist, and you just get whatever junk was there before. So let's make them aware of