Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: mm: fix node memblock init
Hi Mike, On 17/6/20 4:53 pm, Mike Rapoport wrote: From: Angelo Dureghello After pulling 5.7.0 (linux-next merge), mcf5441x mmu boot was hanging silently. memblock_add() seems not appropriate, since using MAX_NUMNODES as node id, while memblock_add_node() sets up memory for node id 0. Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Acked-by: Greg Ungerer Regards Greg --- arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c index 29f47923aa46..7d04210d34f0 100644 --- a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c +++ b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ void __init cf_bootmem_alloc(void) m68k_memory[0].addr = _rambase; m68k_memory[0].size = _ramend - _rambase; - memblock_add(m68k_memory[0].addr, m68k_memory[0].size); + memblock_add_node(m68k_memory[0].addr, m68k_memory[0].size, 0); /* compute total pages in system */ num_pages = PFN_DOWN(_ramend - _rambase);
[PATCH 2/2] m68k: mm: fix node memblock init
From: Angelo Dureghello After pulling 5.7.0 (linux-next merge), mcf5441x mmu boot was hanging silently. memblock_add() seems not appropriate, since using MAX_NUMNODES as node id, while memblock_add_node() sets up memory for node id 0. Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport --- arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c index 29f47923aa46..7d04210d34f0 100644 --- a/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c +++ b/arch/m68k/mm/mcfmmu.c @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ void __init cf_bootmem_alloc(void) m68k_memory[0].addr = _rambase; m68k_memory[0].size = _ramend - _rambase; - memblock_add(m68k_memory[0].addr, m68k_memory[0].size); + memblock_add_node(m68k_memory[0].addr, m68k_memory[0].size, 0); /* compute total pages in system */ num_pages = PFN_DOWN(_ramend - _rambase); -- 2.26.2
