Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: arizona: Correctly report when AIF2/AIF1 is underclocked

2012-10-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:14:13PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > In the interrupt handler for an underclocked event, whilst checking for > the source of the interrupt, AIF3 was checked twice and AIF1 was not > checked. This change correctly checks the AIF1 underclocked bit and > reports the

[PATCH 2/2] mfd: arizona: Correctly report when AIF2/AIF1 is underclocked

2012-10-25 Thread Charles Keepax
In the interrupt handler for an underclocked event, whilst checking for the source of the interrupt, AIF3 was checked twice and AIF1 was not checked. This change correctly checks the AIF1 underclocked bit and reports the correct error messages for all cases. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ---

[PATCH 2/2] mfd: arizona: Correctly report when AIF2/AIF1 is underclocked

2012-10-25 Thread Charles Keepax
In the interrupt handler for an underclocked event, whilst checking for the source of the interrupt, AIF3 was checked twice and AIF1 was not checked. This change correctly checks the AIF1 underclocked bit and reports the correct error messages for all cases. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: arizona: Correctly report when AIF2/AIF1 is underclocked

2012-10-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:14:13PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: In the interrupt handler for an underclocked event, whilst checking for the source of the interrupt, AIF3 was checked twice and AIF1 was not checked. This change correctly checks the AIF1 underclocked bit and reports the correct