Current modification to attrs via sysfs is not fully synchronized.

Process A (change cpumask)      | Process B (change numa affinity)
wq_cpumask_store()              |
  wq_sysfs_prep_attrs()         |
                                | apply_workqueue_attrs()
  apply_workqueue_attrs()       |

It results that the Process B's operation is totally reverted
without any notification, it is a buggy behavior.  So this patch
moves wq_sysfs_prep_attrs() into the protection under wq_pool_mutex
to ensure attrs changes are properly synchronized.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 1c950f9..ee5bf95 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4958,18 +4958,22 @@ static ssize_t wq_nice_store(struct device *dev, struct 
device_attribute *attr,
 {
        struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
        struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
-       int ret;
+       int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+       apply_wqattrs_lock();
 
        attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
        if (!attrs)
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               goto out_unlock;
 
        if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &attrs->nice) == 1 &&
            attrs->nice >= MIN_NICE && attrs->nice <= MAX_NICE)
-               ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+               ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
        else
                ret = -EINVAL;
 
+out_unlock:
+       apply_wqattrs_unlock();
        free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
        return ret ?: count;
 }
@@ -4993,16 +4997,20 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_store(struct device *dev,
 {
        struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
        struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
-       int ret;
+       int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+       apply_wqattrs_lock();
 
        attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
        if (!attrs)
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               goto out_unlock;
 
        ret = cpumask_parse(buf, attrs->cpumask);
        if (!ret)
-               ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+               ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
 
+out_unlock:
+       apply_wqattrs_unlock();
        free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
        return ret ?: count;
 }
@@ -5026,18 +5034,22 @@ static ssize_t wq_numa_store(struct device *dev, struct 
device_attribute *attr,
 {
        struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
        struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
-       int v, ret;
+       int v, ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+       apply_wqattrs_lock();
 
        attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
        if (!attrs)
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               goto out_unlock;
 
        ret = -EINVAL;
        if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &v) == 1) {
                attrs->no_numa = !v;
-               ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+               ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, attrs);
        }
 
+out_unlock:
+       apply_wqattrs_unlock();
        free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
        return ret ?: count;
 }
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to