On 03/15/17 at 02:13pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> PING!
>
> Is there any suggestion for this code bug fix?
>
> Boris added comment in patch 1/2 thread that it can also be fixed by
> swapping the naming - EFI_VA_START and EFI_VA_END. As he said the
> swapping can remove the confusion about the naming,
On 03/15/17 at 02:13pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> PING!
>
> Is there any suggestion for this code bug fix?
>
> Boris added comment in patch 1/2 thread that it can also be fixed by
> swapping the naming - EFI_VA_START and EFI_VA_END. As he said the
> swapping can remove the confusion about the naming,
PING!
Is there any suggestion for this code bug fix?
Boris added comment in patch 1/2 thread that it can also be fixed by
swapping the naming - EFI_VA_START and EFI_VA_END. As he said the
swapping can remove the confusion about the naming, while the con is
changing it now could confuse more
PING!
Is there any suggestion for this code bug fix?
Boris added comment in patch 1/2 thread that it can also be fixed by
swapping the naming - EFI_VA_START and EFI_VA_END. As he said the
swapping can remove the confusion about the naming, while the con is
changing it now could confuse more
Thanks for the change.
Acked-by: Thomas Garnier
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> EFI allocates runtime
Thanks for the change.
Acked-by: Thomas Garnier
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
>>> to
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
>> to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
>> EFI region. The upper
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
>> to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
>> EFI region. The upper boundary of memory
On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
> to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
> EFI region. The upper boundary of memory regions randomized by KASLR should
> be EFI_VA_END if it's
On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
> to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
> EFI region. The upper boundary of memory regions randomized by KASLR should
> be EFI_VA_END if it's
EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
EFI region. The upper boundary of memory regions randomized by KASLR should
be EFI_VA_END if it's adjacent to EFI region, but not EFI_VA_START.
EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
EFI region. The upper boundary of memory regions randomized by KASLR should
be EFI_VA_END if it's adjacent to EFI region, but not EFI_VA_START.
12 matches
Mail list logo