On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:38:21PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> I'm glad Andrew took out the stable Cc:
Actually I did that. I have a habit of thinking about performance issues as
bugs and that is not always the case.
> Please, what's wrong with the patch below, to replace the current
> two
> Please, what's wrong with the patch below, to replace the current
> two or three? I don't have real NUMA myself: does it work?
> If it doesn't work, can you see why not?
It works. It doesn't match my preference. but I don't want block your way.
this area is maintained you. please go ahead.
at
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:38:21PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I'm glad Andrew took out the stable Cc:
Actually I did that. I have a habit of thinking about performance issues as
bugs and that is not always the case.
Please, what's wrong with the patch below, to replace the current
two or
Please, what's wrong with the patch below, to replace the current
two or three? I don't have real NUMA myself: does it work?
If it doesn't work, can you see why not?
It works. It doesn't match my preference. but I don't want block your way.
this area is maintained you. please go ahead.
at
Nathan, Kosaki-san,
I have, at long last, reached the point of looking at this patchset.
And I'm puzzled as to why it has grown more complicated than what you
first sent out.
I've read through the various threads, and some of the changes I like.
I'm glad Andrew took out the stable Cc: obviously
Nathan, Kosaki-san,
I have, at long last, reached the point of looking at this patchset.
And I'm puzzled as to why it has grown more complicated than what you
first sent out.
I've read through the various threads, and some of the changes I like.
I'm glad Andrew took out the stable Cc: obviously
Yes I had failed to notice that.
I'll send a fix shortly.
On 07/23/2012 05:58 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:46:39AM -0500, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
+static unsigned long shmem_interleave(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr)
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:46:39AM -0500, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> +static unsigned long shmem_interleave(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + unsigned long offset;
> +
> + /* Use the vm_files prefered node as the initial offset. */
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:46:39AM -0500, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
+static unsigned long shmem_interleave(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr)
+{
+ unsigned long offset;
+
+ /* Use the vm_files prefered node as the initial offset. */
+
Yes I had failed to notice that.
I'll send a fix shortly.
On 07/23/2012 05:58 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:46:39AM -0500, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
+static unsigned long shmem_interleave(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr)
The tmpfs superblock grants an offset for each inode as they are created. Each
inode then uses that offset to provide a preferred first node for its interleave
in the newly provided shmem_interleave.
Cc: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Nick Piggin
Cc: Hugh Dickins
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn
Cc: KOSAKI
The tmpfs superblock grants an offset for each inode as they are created. Each
inode then uses that offset to provide a preferred first node for its interleave
in the newly provided shmem_interleave.
Cc: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Nick Piggin npig...@gmail.com
Cc: Hugh Dickins
12 matches
Mail list logo
