Thank you, sir. And sorry for taking your time.
Sent by Android device.
Timur Tabi wrote:
Chen Guangyu-B42378 wrote:
> Without dual fifo support, handware underrun would occasionally
> occur and then two audio channels would physically swap. This could
> be easily reproduced in low bus
Chen Guangyu-B42378 wrote:
Without dual fifo support, handware underrun would occasionally
occur and then two audio channels would physically swap. This could
be easily reproduced in low bus frequency situation, while it would
be better if we enable dual fifo.
Ok.
ACK.
--
To unsubscribe from
Without dual fifo support, handware underrun would occasionally occur and then
two audio channels would physically swap. This could be easily reproduced in
low bus frequency situation, while it would be better if we enable dual fifo.
Sent by Android device.
Timur Tabi wrote:
Nicolin Chen
Nicolin Chen wrote:
By enabling dual fifo mode, it would allow SSI enter a better performance
to transimit/receive data without occasional hardware underrun/overrun.
Have you measured any real performance gain with this patch? I
considered adding dual-FIFO support when I originally wrote
By enabling dual fifo mode, it would allow SSI enter a better performance
to transimit/receive data without occasional hardware underrun/overrun.
[ Passed compile-test with mpc85xx_defconfig ]
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c | 24 +++-
1 file
By enabling dual fifo mode, it would allow SSI enter a better performance
to transimit/receive data without occasional hardware underrun/overrun.
[ Passed compile-test with mpc85xx_defconfig ]
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen b42...@freescale.com
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c | 24
Nicolin Chen wrote:
By enabling dual fifo mode, it would allow SSI enter a better performance
to transimit/receive data without occasional hardware underrun/overrun.
Have you measured any real performance gain with this patch? I
considered adding dual-FIFO support when I originally wrote
Without dual fifo support, handware underrun would occasionally occur and then
two audio channels would physically swap. This could be easily reproduced in
low bus frequency situation, while it would be better if we enable dual fifo.
Sent by Android device.
Timur Tabi ti...@tabi.org wrote:
Chen Guangyu-B42378 wrote:
Without dual fifo support, handware underrun would occasionally
occur and then two audio channels would physically swap. This could
be easily reproduced in low bus frequency situation, while it would
be better if we enable dual fifo.
Ok.
ACK.
--
To unsubscribe from
Thank you, sir. And sorry for taking your time.
Sent by Android device.
Timur Tabi ti...@tabi.org wrote:
Chen Guangyu-B42378 wrote:
Without dual fifo support, handware underrun would occasionally
occur and then two audio channels would physically swap. This could
be easily reproduced in
10 matches
Mail list logo
