On 2013-08-02 20:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Konrad, are you OK with this patch now?
Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal
was not altered.
And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it
would be good to confirm this via testing just
On 2013-08-02 20:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Konrad, are you OK with this patch now?
Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal
was not altered.
And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it
would be good to confirm this via testing just
> >>Konrad, are you OK with this patch now?
> >Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal
> >was not altered.
> >
> >And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it
> >would be good to confirm this via testing just in case.
> I had ever let our
On 2013-08-01 23:16, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zhenzhong Duan
wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for
Konrad, are you OK with this patch now?
Yes, I wanted to make sure that the existing behavior under baremetal
was not altered.
And Duan had confirmed it was not - thought to be on a safe side it
would be good to confirm this via testing just in case.
I had ever let our customer test on
On 2013-08-01 23:16, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zhenzhong Duan
zhenzhong.d...@oracle.com wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zhenzhong Duan
> wrote:
> > xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
> > in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in
> > baremetal.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zhenzhong Duan
zhenzhong.d...@oracle.com wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zhenzhong Duan
wrote:
> xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
> in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
>
> Move restore of mask in default_restore_msi_irqs, this could avoid mask
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zhenzhong Duan
zhenzhong.d...@oracle.com wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
Move restore of mask in default_restore_msi_irqs, this
On 2013-07-25 20:25, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:52:00PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
On 2013-07-24 21:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:52:00PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>
> On 2013-07-24 21:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> >>xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
> >>in dom0. It's better to do
On 2013-07-24 21:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
Move restore of mask in
On 2013-07-24 21:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
Move restore of mask in
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:52:00PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
On 2013-07-24 21:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for
On 2013-07-25 20:25, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:52:00PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
On 2013-07-24 21:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
> in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
>
> Move restore of mask in default_restore_msi_irqs, this could avoid mask
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:10AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
Move restore of mask in default_restore_msi_irqs, this could avoid mask
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
Move restore of mask in default_restore_msi_irqs, this could avoid mask
restored twice in dom0, once in hypercall, the other in kernel.
xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs trigger a hypercall to restore addr/data/mask
in dom0. It's better to do the same for default_restore_msi_irqs in baremetal.
Move restore of mask in default_restore_msi_irqs, this could avoid mask
restored twice in dom0, once in hypercall, the other in kernel.
20 matches
Mail list logo
