On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:06:36 -0700
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
> for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
> easier to keep them in sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
easier to keep them in sync.
Why wasn't this done this way in the first place? Out of tree
development for libata or something?
--
Bill
Junio C Hamano wrote:
This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
easier to keep them in sync.
Why wasn't this done this way in the first place? Out of tree
development for libata or something?
--
Bill
On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:06:36 -0700
Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
easier to keep them in sync.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAK
This
This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
easier to keep them in sync.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
* Removes more lines than it adds. I am not proud of the
DMA_BLACK_LIST macro in
This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
easier to keep them in sync.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
* Removes more lines than it adds. I am not proud of the
DMA_BLACK_LIST macro in
6 matches
Mail list logo
