Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-24 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 11/13/2015 03:23 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, it could be failed in current implementation. To track down the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and this new tracepoint will report it. Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-24 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 11/13/2015 03:23 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, it could be failed in current implementation. To track down the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and this new tracepoint will report it. Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-19 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:34:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:23:47 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, > > it could be failed in current implementation. To track down > > the problem, we need to know which

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:23:47 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, > it could be failed in current implementation. To track down > the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and > this new tracepoint will report it.

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:23:47 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, > it could be failed in current implementation. To track down > the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and > this new tracepoint will report

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-19 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:34:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:23:47 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, > > it could be failed in current implementation. To track down > > the problem, we need

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-13 Thread David Rientjes
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, > it could be failed in current implementation. To track down > the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and > this new tracepoint will report it. > > Acked-by: Michal

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-13 Thread David Rientjes
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, > it could be failed in current implementation. To track down > the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and > this new tracepoint will report it. > > Acked-by: Michal

[PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-12 Thread Joonsoo Kim
cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, it could be failed in current implementation. To track down the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and this new tracepoint will report it. Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim ---

[PATCH 2/3] mm/page_isolation: add new tracepoint, test_pages_isolated

2015-11-12 Thread Joonsoo Kim
cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes, it could be failed in current implementation. To track down the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and this new tracepoint will report it. Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim