On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
> enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
>
> Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen
> Acked-by:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
pcs_enable() uses vals-mask instead of pcs-fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs-fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals-mask with bits_per_mux.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen
pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren
---
pcs_enable() uses vals-mask instead of pcs-fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs-fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals-mask with bits_per_mux.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
Acked-by: Tony
* Tony Lindgren [131130 09:08]:
> * Peter Ujfalusi [131128 04:01]:
> > On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
> > > enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
> > >
> > > Fix pcs_disable() to use
* Peter Ujfalusi [131128 04:01]:
> On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
> > enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
> >
> > Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux.
>
> I wonder
* Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com [131128 04:01]:
On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
pcs_enable() uses vals-mask instead of pcs-fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs-fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals-mask with bits_per_mux.
I
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [131130 09:08]:
* Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com [131128 04:01]:
On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
pcs_enable() uses vals-mask instead of pcs-fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs-fmask.
Fix
On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
> enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
>
> Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux.
I wonder how did I missed this?
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi
pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 8
pcs_enable() uses vals-mask instead of pcs-fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs-fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals-mask with bits_per_mux.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 10 --
1 file
On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
pcs_enable() uses vals-mask instead of pcs-fmask when bits_per_mux is
enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs-fmask.
Fix pcs_disable() to use vals-mask with bits_per_mux.
I wonder how did I missed this?
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi
12 matches
Mail list logo