On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:00:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月15日 11:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:00:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月15日 11:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason
On 2016年11月15日 11:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at
On 2016年11月15日 11:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason
On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at
On 2016年11月12日 00:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:18:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM
On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in
On 2016年11月11日 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
>On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
> > > checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:18:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
> > > checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since
On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since latter is the cached avail
index from guest but we want to know if there's
On 2016年11月10日 03:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since latter is the cached avail
index from guest but we want to know if there's
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
> checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since latter is the cached avail
> index from guest but we want to know if there's pending available
> buffers in the virtqueue.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:38:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
> checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since latter is the cached avail
> index from guest but we want to know if there's pending available
> buffers in the virtqueue.
>
>
We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since latter is the cached avail
index from guest but we want to know if there's pending available
buffers in the virtqueue.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
---
We should use vq->last_avail_idx instead of vq->avail_idx in the
checking of vhost_vq_avail_empty() since latter is the cached avail
index from guest but we want to know if there's pending available
buffers in the virtqueue.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +-
1 file
20 matches
Mail list logo