On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:05:59AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> x86_32 and x86_64 need slightly different sp0 values, and x86_32's was
> incorrect for init. (This never mattered -- the init thread never
> runs user code, so we never used sp0 for anything.)
Damn old x86 cruft - sp0 is the
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:05:59AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
x86_32 and x86_64 need slightly different sp0 values, and x86_32's was
incorrect for init. (This never mattered -- the init thread never
runs user code, so we never used sp0 for anything.)
Damn old x86 cruft - sp0 is the stack
x86_32 and x86_64 need slightly different sp0 values, and x86_32's was
incorrect for init. (This never mattered -- the init thread never
runs user code, so we never used sp0 for anything.)
Fix it and mostly unify them.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 7
x86_32 and x86_64 need slightly different sp0 values, and x86_32's was
incorrect for init. (This never mattered -- the init thread never
runs user code, so we never used sp0 for anything.)
Fix it and mostly unify them.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
