On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:10:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> [...]
> > Pin groups are supposed to be something that represents some property of
> > the pinctrl HW itself. So, if you have register "X" bits 3-0 that define
> >
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:10:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
[...]
Pin groups are supposed to be something that represents some property of
the pinctrl HW itself. So, if you have register X bits 3-0 that define
the mux
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Christian Ruppert
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Christian Ruppert
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OK, that can also be called a
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, that can also be called a "bank" or "register" but whatever.
> >
> > As you suggested below
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
OK, that can also be called a bank or register but whatever.
As you
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> OK, that can also be called a "bank" or "register" but whatever.
>
> As you suggested below I re-read Documentation/pinctrl.txt and it got me
> even more confused:
> Am
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:10:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/21/2013 09:57 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
> >> wrote:
> >>> [Me]
> I don't see any of the port
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:10:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/21/2013 09:57 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
[Me]
I don't see any of
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
OK, that can also be called a bank or register but whatever.
As you suggested below I re-read Documentation/pinctrl.txt and it got me
even
On 08/21/2013 09:57 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
>> wrote:
>>> [Me]
I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
in this version and that is how I
On 08/21/2013 09:57 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
[Me]
I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
in this version and
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
> wrote:
> > [Me]
> >> I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
> >> in this version and that is how I think it should be kept:
> >> the "port" particulars
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
[Me]
I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
in this version and that is how I think it should be kept:
the port
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
wrote:
> [Me]
>> I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
>> in this version and that is how I think it should be kept:
>> the "port" particulars is a thing for the driver and not the
>> device tree.
>
> I'm not sure if
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
[Me]
I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
in this version and that is how I think it should be kept:
the port particulars is a thing for the driver and not the
device tree.
I'm
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:35:03AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Sorry for taking eternities to look into this.
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Christian Ruppert
> wrote:
>
> > The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
> > Used to control the pinmux and
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:35:03AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
Sorry for taking eternities to look into this.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to
Sorry for taking eternities to look into this.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Christian Ruppert
wrote:
> The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
> Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert
Sorry for taking eternities to look into this.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Christian Ruppert
christian.rupp...@abilis.com wrote:
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
On 07/26/2013 03:42 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:54:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 10:07 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> ...
>>> Well, perhaps my definition of "inside"/"outside" pins was not quite
>>> clear: The pin groups define the set of (kernel
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:54:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 10:07 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> ...
> > Well, perhaps my definition of "inside"/"outside" pins was not quite
> > clear: The pin groups define the set of (kernel internal) pin numbers of
> > "outside" pins which
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:54:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/18/2013 10:07 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
Well, perhaps my definition of inside/outside pins was not quite
clear: The pin groups define the set of (kernel internal) pin numbers of
outside pins which are used by pin
On 07/26/2013 03:42 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:54:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/18/2013 10:07 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
Well, perhaps my definition of inside/outside pins was not quite
clear: The pin groups define the set of (kernel internal) pin
On 07/18/2013 10:07 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
> Well, perhaps my definition of "inside"/"outside" pins was not quite
> clear: The pin groups define the set of (kernel internal) pin numbers of
> "outside" pins which are used by pin controller to map a given
> interface. Inside pins are not
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 02:47 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> OK, a small drawing of our hardware should
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/16/2013 02:47 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear,
On 07/18/2013 10:07 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
Well, perhaps my definition of inside/outside pins was not quite
clear: The pin groups define the set of (kernel internal) pin numbers of
outside pins which are used by pin controller to map a given
interface. Inside pins are not numbered
On 07/16/2013 02:47 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> ...
>>> OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear, let's take
>>> an imaginary example of one port with 10
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> ...
> > OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear, let's take
> > an imaginary example of one port with 10 pins, one i2c interface, one
> > spi interface and one
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear, let's take
an imaginary example of one port with 10 pins, one i2c interface, one
spi interface and one GPIO bank:
On 07/16/2013 02:47 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear, let's take
an imaginary example of one port with 10 pins, one i2c
On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
> OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear, let's take
> an imaginary example of one port with 10 pins, one i2c interface, one
> spi interface and one GPIO bank:
>
> | mux N-1|
> ++
>
On 07/08/2013 07:02 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
...
OK, a small drawing of our hardware should make this clear, let's take
an imaginary example of one port with 10 pins, one i2c interface, one
spi interface and one GPIO bank:
| mux N-1|
++
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 12:40:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 03:49 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:40:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 12:40:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/05/2013 03:49 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:40:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/05/2013 03:49 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:40:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> [...]
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:40:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> [...]
> >>> +Example
> >>> +---
> >>> +
> >>> +iomux:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:40:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
[...]
+Example
+---
+
+iomux: iomux@FF10601c {
+
On 07/05/2013 03:49 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:40:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
[...]
+Example
On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>>> The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
>>> Used to control the pinmux and is a
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
> > Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
>
> > diff --git
> >
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
diff --git
On 06/26/2013 05:50 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:35:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
> Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/abilis,tb10x-iomux.txt
>
On 06/18/2013 03:29 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/abilis,tb10x-iomux.txt
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Hascoet
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/abilis,tb10x-iomux.txt| 81 ++
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert christian.rupp...@abilis.com
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Hascoet pierrick.hasc...@abilis.com
---
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Hascoet
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/abilis,tb10x-iomux.txt| 81 ++
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig|4 +
drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert christian.rupp...@abilis.com
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Hascoet pierrick.hasc...@abilis.com
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/abilis,tb10x-iomux.txt| 81 ++
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
52 matches
Mail list logo
