Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment

2020-05-08 Thread Kees Cook 
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:44:46PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook 

-- 
Kees Cook

[PATCH 2/6] exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment

2020-05-08 Thread Eric W. Biederman 


Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 
---
 fs/exec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index d4387bc92292..82106241ed53 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char 
*buf, bool exec)
  * Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be
  * seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal
  * signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised
- * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below).
+ * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below).
  */
 int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
 {
-- 
2.20.1