On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:37:15 -0800
Jean Tourrilhes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was sent to netdev :
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev=110747857226852=2
Resend it to netdev instead, please.
If nobody responds, it means the networking maintainers simply
are backlogged and
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:24:22PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
> Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > > Hi Marcelo,
> > >
> > > I did not receive any feedback on this
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
> > was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in
ave no problems with it.
David, what is your opinion?
> Jean
>
> - Forwarded message from jt -----
>
> Subject: [PATCH 2.4] SIOCSIFNAME wildcard support
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> This patch adds wildcard support for the SIO
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
Thanks...
Jean
- Forwarded message from jt -
Subject: [PATCH 2.4] SIOCSIFNAME wildcard support
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
Thanks...
Jean
- Forwarded message from jt -
Subject: [PATCH 2.4] SIOCSIFNAME wildcard support
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
with it.
David, what is your opinion?
Jean
- Forwarded message from jt -
Subject: [PATCH 2.4] SIOCSIFNAME wildcard support
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Marcelo,
This patch adds wildcard support for the SIOCSIFNAME ioctl,
like what was done in 2.6.1. SIOCSIFNAME allow
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:24:22PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:37:15 -0800
Jean Tourrilhes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was sent to netdev :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=110747857226852w=2
Resend it to netdev instead, please.
If nobody responds, it means the networking maintainers simply
are backlogged and
Hi Marcelo,
This patch adds wildcard support for the SIOCSIFNAME ioctl,
like what was done in 2.6.1. SIOCSIFNAME allow a user space tool to
change network interface names (such as nameif, ifrename, or ip link),
this patch allow those tools to specify a pattern, such as "eth%d" or
Hi Marcelo,
This patch adds wildcard support for the SIOCSIFNAME ioctl,
like what was done in 2.6.1. SIOCSIFNAME allow a user space tool to
change network interface names (such as nameif, ifrename, or ip link),
this patch allow those tools to specify a pattern, such as eth%d or
12 matches
Mail list logo
