From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:58:36 +0900 Hirokazu Takata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
> > +|| !defined(CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER)
>
> hm, I didn't know that the preprocessor permitted that.
>
> I'll stick
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:58:36 +0900 Hirokazu Takata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
+|| !defined(CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER)
hm, I didn't know that the preprocessor permitted that.
I'll stick a \ in there
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:58:36 +0900 Hirokazu Takata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
> +|| !defined(CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER)
hm, I didn't know that the preprocessor permitted that.
I'll stick a \ in there to be safe.
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hello,
This patch fixes a rarely-happened but severe scheduling problem of
the recent m32r kernel of 2.6.17-rc3 or later.
In the following previous m32r patch, the switch_to macro was
modified not to do unnecessary push/pop operations for tuning.
> [PATCH] m32r: update switch_to macro for tuning
Hello,
This patch fixes a rarely-happened but severe scheduling problem of
the recent m32r kernel of 2.6.17-rc3 or later.
In the following previous m32r patch, the switch_to macro was
modified not to do unnecessary push/pop operations for tuning.
[PATCH] m32r: update switch_to macro for tuning
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:58:36 +0900 Hirokazu Takata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
+|| !defined(CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER)
hm, I didn't know that the preprocessor permitted that.
I'll stick a \ in there to be safe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
6 matches
Mail list logo